Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:44:44 -0400
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Subject: Re: bkSVN live
Message-ID: <20030616134444.GT542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
References: <20030615133631.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030615133631.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1230
Lines: 29

Somehow the logic I had in my python script that was meant to ignore
BitKeeper/* files (not put them in the repo), which worked on the other
two machines I've run this on, seems to be exposing a bug in the python
on kernel.bkbits.net. It did not allow the COPYING file through the
os.path.walk() callbacks, so it was not in the repo as well.

I am not ignoring files anymore...I don't think it hurts anything having
the BitKeeper files. It was only a personal hack I had in place for when
I was using this setup just for myself for the past 3-4 weeks.

Now, Larry and I have our opposing conspiracy theories about why
ignoring the BitKeeper files would cause the GPL license to also be
ignored, but that's a neither here nor there ;)

Fact is, I had to rebuild the repo's. That means a complete re-checkout
for everyone.

Sorry.

-- 
Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo       - http://www.deqo.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/