Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263918AbTFPOrd (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:47:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263921AbTFPOrd (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:47:33 -0400 Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.74]:8381 "EHLO post.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263918AbTFPOrc (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:47:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:58:34 +0200 From: Dominik Brodowski To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Cc: mikpe@csd.uu.se, Russell King , LKML Subject: Re: 2.5.71 cardbus problem + possible solution Message-ID: <20030616145834.GA11097@brodo.de> References: <16109.50492.555714.813028@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030616153253.A13312@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <16109.54908.249375.482633@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1055775186.587.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1055775186.587.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 777 Lines: 17 On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > I must agree with. I think backwards compatibility is important if we > want widespread adoption of 2.6 from the beginning. But there's a > question I had in mind for long time: is cardmgr really needed? Isn't > hotplug more than enough to handle CardBus devices? One aim of my work is to deprecate cardmgr for both CardBus (32-bit) and PCMCIA (16-bit) devices. For CardBus, most pieces should be there already, for PCMCIA the road is much longer. Dominik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/