Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:33:07 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: zhouxianrong <zhouxianrong@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
        mgorman@suse.de, l.stach@pengutronix.de, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
        hannes@cmpxchg.org, minchan@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com,
        luto@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
        rientjes@google.com, ming.ling@spreadtrum.com, jack@suse.cz,
        ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
        Mi.Sophia.Wang@huawei.com, zhouxiyu@huawei.com, weidu.du@huawei.com,
        fanghua3@huawei.com, won.ho.park@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm] introduce reverse buddy concept to reduce buddy
 fragment
Message-ID: <20170703153307.GA11848@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <1498821941-55771-1-git-send-email-zhouxianrong@huawei.com>
 <20170703074829.GD3217@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <bfb807bf-92ce-27aa-d848-a6cab055447f@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bfb807bf-92ce-27aa-d848-a6cab055447f@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 276
Lines: 10

On Mon 03-07-17 20:02:16, zhouxianrong wrote:
[...]
> from above i think after applying the patch the result is better.

You haven't described your testing methodology, nor the workload that was
tested. As such this data is completely meaningless.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs