Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263964AbTFPPXX (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:23:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263971AbTFPPXX (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:23:23 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:12943 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263964AbTFPPXW (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:23:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:38:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Mochel X-X-Sender: mochel@cherise To: Christoph Hellwig cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, , Subject: Re: GFDL in the kernel tree In-Reply-To: <20030615140758.A9390@infradead.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 721 Lines: 22 > (3) Documentation/kobject.txt, the other files claims it's under > GFDL but doesn't actually include the license text as mandated > by the GFDL. > > And of course there's still all those nasty issue with GFDL like > invariant sections and cover texts that make at least the debian-devel > list believe it's an unfree license.. > > Folks, could we please only use GPL-compatible licenses in the kernel > tree? No problem, I'll remove it from kobject.txt. -pat - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/