Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752123AbdGDC7F (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 22:59:05 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:53355 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751838AbdGDC7E (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 22:59:04 -0400 From: Michael Ellerman To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , linuxppc-dev , "Gautham R . Shenoy" , Linux PM , Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [1/3] cpuidle: powerpc: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs In-Reply-To: References: <20170614130241.19865-2-npiggin@gmail.com> <3wyzKL1g2Vz9s65@ozlabs.org> <878tkaqgu2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 12:59:01 +1000 Message-ID: <87y3s4ykju.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1220 Lines: 36 "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Ellerman >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 13:02:39 UTC, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >>>>> local_irq_enable can cause interrupts to be taken which could >>>>> take significant amount of processing time. The idle process >>>>> should set its polling flag before this, so another process that >>>>> wakes it during this time will not have to send an IPI. >>>>> >>>>> Expand the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG coverage to as large as possible. >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy >>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin >>>> >>>> Series applied to powerpc next, thanks. >>>> >>>> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3fc5ee927ff4ffed6aa2fcd44d2fbf >>> >>> OK >>> >>> I've applied it too, so I guess I should drop it? >> >> Erk sorry. I hadn't heard anything so I picked it up. >> >> If you can drop it that would be good, but if not git will probably work >> it out mostly :) > > I've dropped it, no problem. Thanks. cheers