Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:58:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:57:53 -0500 Received: from [62.172.234.2] ([62.172.234.2]:41871 "EHLO penguin.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:57:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:56:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Tigran Aivazian To: Alan Cox cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.2ac7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > [24940903.pdf] > Table 14 in paticular gives the config bits ok, thank you. Now I understand (maybe) whats' going on. Linux treated bits 22,23,24,25 but ignored 27 which it shouldn't have. Now, coupled with the fact that the problematic box I have (Celeron) has that bit 27 set suggests that we ought to extend mult[] table appropriately. The values for that Celeron do not match anything in the Table 14 so we have to extend mult[] emprirically. (so I now come back to the idea of 4bit representation of 'bus'). I will stop here/now but I will definitely come back to this interesting problem in 24 hours. But if anyone fixes it before then, I won't cry :) Of course, before sending anything I will make sure my patch works on _all_ my machines without any exceptions. Regards, Tigran - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/