Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752623AbdGEVWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:22:41 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:35741 "EHLO mail-it0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752557AbdGEVWh (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:22:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170703064405.7ccb5a94@lwn.net> References: <20170618234630.19964-1-corbet@lwn.net> <20170703082538.tskdygdzkxkcazcr@phenom.ffwll.local> <20170703064405.7ccb5a94@lwn.net> From: Jim Davis Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:22:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make PDF builds work again To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Daniel Vetter , linux-doc , linux-kernel , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Daniel Vetter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 19 On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +0200 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Only now stumbled over the full thread, but the drm patch is already >> queued up for at least 4.13 (Dave was out and all that). I guess we could >> try to cherry-pick through stable. > > I kind of gave up on the 4.12 goal, at least for now. The number of > complaints has not been huge - I suspect you're far from the only one who > is not too worried about building PDFs...:) If fixing pdf (and ps) builds isn't worth the bother -- which I wouldn't debate -- then it's best to just drop those build targets. The only worrisome thing I see here is having build targets carried from release to release that don't work. -- Jim