Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751997AbdGFJba (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:31:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56388 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750778AbdGFJb3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:31:29 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4EC164E4D8 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=aarcange@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 4EC164E4D8 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:31:26 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Christoffer Dall Cc: Alexander Graf , Suzuki K Poulose , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle hva aging while destroying the vm Message-ID: <20170706093126.GJ5738@redhat.com> References: <1499235631-141725-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20170705085700.GA16881@e107814-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20170706074513.GC18106@cbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170706074513.GC18106@cbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2328 Lines: 62 Hello, On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:45:13AM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > Let's look at the callers to stage2_get_pmd, which is the only caller of > stage2_get_pud, where the problem was observed: > > user_mem_abort > -> stage2_set_pmd_huge > -> stage2_get_pmd > > user_mem_abort > -> stage2_set_pte > -> stage2_get_pmd > > handle_access_fault > -> stage2_get_pmd > > For the above three functions, pgd cannot ever be NULL, because this is > running in the context of a VCPU thread, which means the reference on > the VM fd must not reach zero, so no need to call that here. Just a minor nitpick: the !pgd bypass is necessary before the KVM fd technically reaches zero. exit_mm->mmput->exit_mmap() will invoke the __mmu_notifier_release even if the KVM fd isn't zero yet. This is because the secondary MMU page faults must be shutdown before freeing the guest RAM (nothing can call handle_mm_fault or any get_user_pages after mm->mm_users == 0), regardless if mmu_notifier_unregister hasn't been called yet (i.e. if the /dev/kvm fd is still open). Usually the fd is closed immediately after exit_mmap, as exit_files is called shortly after exit_mm() but there's a common window where the fd is still open but the !pgd check is already necessary (plus the fd could in theory be passed to other processes). > using the kvm->mmu_lock() and understanding that this only happens when > mmu notifiers call into the KVM MMU code outside the context of the VM. Agreed. The other arches don't need any special check to serialize against kvm_mmu_notifier_release, they're just looking up shadow pagetables through spte rmap (and they'll find nothing if kvm_mmu_notifier_release already run). In theory it would make more sense to put the overhead in the slow path by adding a mutex to the mmu_notifier struct and then using that to solve the race between mmu_notifier_release and mmu_notifier_unregister, and then to hlist_del_init to unhash the mmu notifier and then to call synchronize_srcu, before calling ->release while holding some mutex. However that's going to be marginally slower for the other arches. In practice I doubt this is measurable and getting away with one less mutex in mmu notifier_release vs mmu_notifier_unregister sounds simpler but comments welcome... Thanks, Andrea