Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752580AbdGFVDS (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:03:18 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:57925 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751873AbdGFVDR (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:03:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 23:03:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: kernel test robot cc: Dou Liyang , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, bhe@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, lkp@01.org Subject: Re: [x86/time] 03fa63cc96: ACPI_Error:Table[DMAR]is_not_invalidated_during_early_boot_stage(#/tbxface -#) In-Reply-To: <20170706145412.GA30520@inn.lkp.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20170706145412.GA30520@inn.lkp.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1136 Lines: 26 On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, kernel test robot wrote: > commit: 03fa63cc96ab35592e0a7d522b8edbc1e6b02d22 ("x86/time: Initialize interrupt mode behind timer init") > +----------------+------------+------------+ > | | 43436935b7 | 03fa63cc96 | > +----------------+------------+------------+ > | boot_successes | 0 | 4 | > +----------------+------------+------------+ So 03fa63cc96 makes the box boot again. I'm confused as usual by the output of this tool. > kern :info : [ 0.005000] tsc: Fast TSC calibration using PIT > kern :info : [ 0.006000] tsc: Detected 2195.020 MHz processor > kern :info : [ 0.007000] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 4390.04 BogoMIPS (lpj=2195020) > kern :info : [ 0.008001] pid_max: default: 90112 minimum: 704 > kern :info : [ 0.009037] ACPI: Core revision 20170303 > kern :err : [ 0.010002] ACPI Error: Table [DMAR] is not invalidated during early boot stage (20170303/tbxface-193) Sure we have a error message here, but compared to what? Compared to something which does not boot at all? Thanks, tglx