Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 13:48:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 13:48:30 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:47049 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 13:48:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:46:27 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stephen Tweedie , Robert Read Subject: Re: [patch] set kiobuf io_count once, instead of increment Message-ID: <20010302184627.A28854@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010227162222.A6389@tenchi.datarithm.net> <20010228091859.A9540@tenchi.datarithm.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010228091859.A9540@tenchi.datarithm.net>; from rread@datarithm.net on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:18:59AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:18:59AM -0800, Robert Read wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 10:50:54PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > This is true, but it looks like the brw_kiovec allocation failure > handling is broken already; it's calling __put_unused_buffer_head on > bhs without waiting for them to complete first. Also, the err won't > be returned if the previous batch of bhs finished ok. It looks like > brw_kiovec needs some work, but I'm going to need some coffee first... Right, looks like this happened when somebody was changing the bh submission mechanism to use submit_bh(). I'll fix it. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/