Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752617AbdGGWPz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:15:55 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56182 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750941AbdGGWPy (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:15:54 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 559D422BD8
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:15:49 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>, claudio@evidence.eu.com,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it>,
        bristot@redhat.com, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
        Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread
 be SCHED_DEADLINE
Message-ID: <20170707181549.5ca5cf31@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <CAJWu+ord8UTQhQs0cThPejg-H+56j+7kH6ohaukwO2466_zg1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170705085905.6558-1-juri.lelli@arm.com>
        <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707071244520.1871@nanos>
        <20170707105316.whutk3h6x2h6xvyt@e106622-lin>
        <4582085.aKtjXTl7qR@aspire.rjw.lan>
        <20170707175805.6bd8f34d@gandalf.local.home>
        <CAJWu+ord8UTQhQs0cThPejg-H+56j+7kH6ohaukwO2466_zg1g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 597
Lines: 17

On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:07:09 -0700
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> wrote:


> > It is rather long. Although I actually hate the SUGOV, it is easily
> > grepable. Just comment what it stands for. We can always change it
> > later.  
> 
> I was thinking why not just SCHED_FLAG_CPUFREQ. That says its for
> cpufreq purposes, and is a bit self-documenting. "WORKER" is a bit
> redundant and can be dropped in my opinion.

I was thinking that too, but was wondering how tightly coupled is this
with SCHED_DEADLINE? I like the searchability of SUGOV, where as
CPUFREQ is still quite broad.

-- Steve