Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265038AbTFRBmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:42:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265039AbTFRBmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:42:50 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:56840 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265038AbTFRBmt (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:42:49 -0400 Message-ID: <3EEFC6A3.5010406@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:55:47 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Zytor Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry McVoy CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71] References: <20030615002153.GA20896@work.bitmover.com> <20030618013940.GA19176@work.bitmover.com> In-Reply-To: <20030618013940.GA19176@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 21 Larry McVoy wrote: > > It seems to me that kernel.org is the right place but if hpa is too busy > (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of > domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of > distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS > servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries > if that makes people feel safe. > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with it. Setting up actual servers is another matter. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/