Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: chelsio: cxgb3: constify attribute_group structures.
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, santosh@chelsio.com,
        davem@davemloft.net
References: <0e68326e48e123c70191169a0c0da820237425ec.1499682619.git.arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
 <1499706011.5468.15.camel@perches.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8884bd80-b8d5-1c1e-5235-b0a0c173bc45@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:11:06 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1499706011.5468.15.camel@perches.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1028
Lines: 28

Hi Joe,


On Monday 10 July 2017 10:30 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 16:04 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
>> working with attribute_groups provided by <linux/sysfs.h> work
>> with const attribute_group. So mark the non-const structs as const.
> I think it's good you are doing all of these.
>
> Instead of individually sending these patches, could you
> please send a patch series for all of these attribute_group
> patches with a cover letter at the same time?
>
> That could make it easier for a trivial maintainer to apply
> all of these at once and not get some applied and others
> ignored or dropped on the floor.
>
Once again, I will send all of patch together, But I have doubt. If it's 
having
different maintainer. Example- 'net:' subsystem is having a different 
different
maintainer. So do i need to add all the maintainer in single list. Which 
can confuse
what patch is for what maintainer. Please suggest me.

Thanks ,
~arvind