Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755256AbdGKGBM (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 02:01:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:33895 "EHLO mail-pg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754832AbdGKGBL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 02:01:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:31:06 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM , Russell King - ARM Linux , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] cpufreq: provide data for frequency-invariant load-tracking support Message-ID: <20170711060106.GL2928@vireshk-i7> References: <20170706094948.8779-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <22f004af-0158-8265-2da5-34743f294bfb@arm.com> <12829054.TWIodSo4bb@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 390 Lines: 11 On 10-07-17, 13:02, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Yes, I will change this. The #define approach is not really necessary > here since we're not in the scheduler hot-path and inlining is not > really required here. It would be part of scheduler hot-path for the fast-switching case, isn't it ? (I am not arguing against using weak functions, just wanted to correct above statement). -- viresh