Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:40:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:40:07 -0500 Received: from [194.46.8.33] ([194.46.8.33]:59401 "EHLO angusbay.vnl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:39:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:40:50 +0000 From: Dale Amon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: General interest: lawyers talking about GPL and Linux Message-ID: <20010302204050.J26403@vnl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i X-Operating-System: Linux, the choice of a GNU generation Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ______________________________ "Legal Implications of Open-Source Software" University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming BY: DAVID MCGOWAN University of Minnesota Law School Contact: DAVID MCGOWAN Email: Mailto:dmcgowan@tc.umn.edu Postal: University of Minnesota Law School 229 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA ABSTRACT: This article examines some legal and economic aspects of software produced under licenses that provide for distribution of source code and allow downstream users to copy, modify, and redistribute code. The article focuses in particular on the General Public License (GPL), which grants permission to engage in such activities on the condition that downstream users make their own works available on the same terms on which they received the code. Production under this model is informal compared to production in conventional firms. Persons who work on projects utilizing these licenses do not receive wages from those who initiate or maintain the projects. This model therefore poses questions about traditional assumptions of agent behavior that characterize the Theory of the Firm literature. This article first analyzes the agency question and contends that classifying software by license terms provides an incomplete understanding of this form of production. The social structures necessary to sustain production vary depending upon the complexity, and therefore cost, of different projects; the market position of different projects is relevant as well. Production of simple, low-cost projects may require little if any coordination and therefore little if any hierarchy. Production of complex projects, such as the GNU/Linux operating system, require coordination and are in fact characterized by hierarchy. The article discusses the social factors that have thus far supported these hierarchies. The article also analyzes the reciprocal licensing model of the GPL, and discusses various issues relevant to its enforceability under existing copyright and contract law. ------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------ Use Linux: A computer Dale Amon, CEO/MD is a terrible thing Village Networking Ltd to waste. Belfast, Northern Ireland ------------------------------------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/