Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265226AbTFROKP (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:10:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265234AbTFROKN (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:10:13 -0400 Received: from granite.he.net ([216.218.226.66]:28676 "EHLO granite.he.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265226AbTFROJ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:09:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:22:07 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Margit Schubert-While Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] More i2c driver changes for 2.5.70 Message-ID: <20030618142206.GA16055@kroah.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030612120959.00aec370@pop.t-online.de> <5.1.0.14.2.20030612120959.00aec370@pop.t-online.de> <5.1.0.14.2.20030618141052.00af0b50@pop.t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20030618141052.00af0b50@pop.t-online.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 898 Lines: 28 On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Margit Schubert-While wrote: > The lm85, adm1021 patches also apply cleanly to 2.5.72 :-) Yes, I have them in a bk tree and will be sending them to Linus later today :) > Question to Greg, Philip : > Is there really a race conditon with the update function ? Where do you think the race is? > If so, all sensors are incorrect (also in CVS lmsensors). > Comments ? > > Is any thought being given to merging ACPI and sensors ? The way we report the sensor values to userspace, yes, I have talked with the acpi people about this in the past. But it looks like a 2.7 thing at the earliest. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/