Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933959AbdGKTcp (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:32:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58576 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933821AbdGKTcn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:32:43 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3E05C61B83 Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rkrcmar@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 3E05C61B83 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:32:36 +0200 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= To: Bandan Das Cc: David Hildenbrand , kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: nVMX: Emulate EPTP switching for the L1 hypervisor Message-ID: <20170711193235.GE3326@potion> References: <20170710204936.4001-1-bsd@redhat.com> <20170710204936.4001-4-bsd@redhat.com> <2d50ebc4-9328-ce08-b55b-6a331ee13cc3@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2065 Lines: 55 2017-07-11 14:24-0400, Bandan Das: > Bandan Das writes: > > If there's a triple fault, I think it's a good idea to inject it > > back. Basically, there's no need to take care of damage control > > that L1 is intentionally doing. > > > >>> + goto fail; > >>> + kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu); > >>> + vmcs12->ept_pointer = address; > >>> + kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu); > >> > >> I was thinking about something like this: > >> > >> kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu); > >> old = vmcs12->ept_pointer; > >> vmcs12->ept_pointer = address; > >> if (kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu)) { > >> /* pointer invalid, restore previous state */ > >> kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu); > >> vmcs12->ept_pointer = old; > >> kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu); > >> goto fail; > >> } > >> > >> The you can inherit the checks from mmu_check_root(). > > Actually, thinking about this a bit more, I agree with you. Any fault > with a vmfunc operation should end with a vmfunc vmexit, so this > is a good thing to have. Thank you for this idea! :) SDM says IF tent_EPTP is not a valid EPTP value (would cause VM entry to fail if in EPTP) THEN VMexit; and no other mentions of a VM exit, so I think that the VM exit happens only under these conditions: — The EPT memory type (bits 2:0) must be a value supported by the processor as indicated in the IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP MSR (see Appendix A.10). — Bits 5:3 (1 less than the EPT page-walk length) must be 3, indicating an EPT page-walk length of 4; see Section 28.2.2. — Bit 6 (enable bit for accessed and dirty flags for EPT) must be 0 if bit 21 of the IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP MSR (see Appendix A.10) is read as 0, indicating that the processor does not support accessed and dirty flags for EPT. — Reserved bits 11:7 and 63:N (where N is the processor’s physical-address width) must all be 0. And it looks like we need parts of nested_ept_init_mmu_context() to properly handle VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT. The KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT can be handled by kvm_mmu_reload in vcpu_run if we just invalidate the MMU.