Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932876AbdGKWJo (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:09:44 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:34954 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932270AbdGKWJm (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:09:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1499810936.2865.32.camel@kernel.crashing.org> Subject: Re: [RFC v5 12/38] mm: ability to disable execute permission on a key at creation From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Ram Pai Cc: Dave Hansen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:08:56 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20170711215105.GA5542@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> References: <1499289735-14220-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1499289735-14220-13-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <3bd2ffd4-33ad-ce23-3db1-d1292e69ca9b@intel.com> <1499808577.2865.30.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20170711215105.GA5542@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2008 Lines: 52 On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:51 -0700, Ram Pai wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:29:37AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 11:11 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > On 07/05/2017 02:21 PM, Ram Pai wrote: > > > > Currently sys_pkey_create() provides the ability to disable read > > > > and write permission on the key, at creation. powerpc has the > > > > hardware support to disable execute on a pkey as well.This patch > > > > enhances the interface to let disable execute at key creation > > > > time. x86 does not allow this. Hence the next patch will add > > > > ability in x86 to return error if PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE is > > > > specified. > > > > That leads to the question... How do you tell userspace. > > > > (apologies if I missed that in an existing patch in the series) > > > > How do we inform userspace of the key capabilities ? There are at least > > two things userspace may want to know already: > > > > - What protection bits are supported for a key > > the userspace is the one which allocates the keys and enables/disables the > protection bits on the key. the kernel is just a facilitator. Now if the > use space wants to know the current permissions on a given key, it can > just read the AMR/PKRU register on powerpc/intel respectively. You misunderstand. How does userspace knows on a given system whether execute permission control is supported for keys ? > > > > > - How many keys exist > > There is no standard way of finding this other than trying to allocate > as many till you fail. A procfs or sysfs file can be added to expose > this information. > > > > > - Which keys are available for use by userspace. On PowerPC, the > > kernel can reserve some keys for itself, so can the hypervisor. In > > fact, they do. > > this information can be exposed through /proc or /sysfs > > I am sure there will be more demands and requirements as applications > start leveraging these feature. > > RP > > > > Cheers, > > Ben. > >