Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265239AbTFRQmW (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:42:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265256AbTFRQmV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:42:21 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:64673 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265239AbTFRQmK (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:42:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:55:44 -0400 From: Bill Nottingham To: Anders Karlsson Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , LKML Subject: Re: 2.4.22 timeline was RE: 2.4.21-rc7 ACPI broken Message-ID: <20030618125544.D14270@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Anders Karlsson , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML References: <3EE66C86.8090708@free.fr> <1055913307.2436.27.camel@tor.trudheim.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1055913307.2436.27.camel@tor.trudheim.com>; from anders@trudheim.com on Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:15:07AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 604 Lines: 14 Anders Karlsson (anders@trudheim.com) said: > How about the backported cpufreq patch from Bill Nottingham? Can that > one go in as well please? It is not a big patch as such and it is > working as far as I can tell. I have been running it since it was posted > on the list last week. It requires the more substantial generic cpufreq backport first. :) Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/