Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752983AbdGLPAU (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:00:20 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:52102 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750947AbdGLPAQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:00:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:00:09 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: sean.wang@mediatek.com Cc: john@phrozen.org, davem@davemloft.net, nbd@openwrt.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net-next: mediatek: add support for MediaTek MT7622 SoC Message-ID: <20170712150009.GE2557@lunn.ch> References: <42912dfa706f0d1f1bbe152da71dc00c0a4e18cc.1499829241.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42912dfa706f0d1f1bbe152da71dc00c0a4e18cc.1499829241.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1203 Lines: 35 Hi Sean > static void mtk_phy_link_adjust(struct net_device *dev) > { > struct mtk_mac *mac = netdev_priv(dev); > @@ -269,6 +311,7 @@ static int mtk_phy_connect(struct net_device *dev) > if (!np) > return -ENODEV; > > + mac->ge_mode = 0; > switch (of_get_phy_mode(np)) { > case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_TRGMII: > mac->trgmii = true; > @@ -276,7 +319,15 @@ static int mtk_phy_connect(struct net_device *dev) > case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID: > case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID: > case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII: > - mac->ge_mode = 0; > + break; > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII: > + if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SGMII)) > + mtk_gmac_sgmii_hw_setup(eth, mac->id); > + break; > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL: > + if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_GMAC1_ESW) && !mac->id) > + /* Setup the path through ESW internal switch */ > + mtk_w32(eth, MTK_MUX_TO_ESW, MTK_MAC_MISC); This bit is interesting. Generally, there is no PHY at all between the MAC and the switch. So i don't think this is correct. Please can you take this out for the moment, until you actually add support for the switch. We can discuss it then, when we see the bigger picture. Andrew