Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752314AbdGLWkt (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:40:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33298 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751131AbdGLWks (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:40:48 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com B03784ACC7 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jpoimboe@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com B03784ACC7 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:40:45 -0500 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Andres Freund Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Jiri Slaby , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf) Message-ID: <20170712224045.4bsa6vngowr72kzk@treble> References: <20170712214920.5droainfqjmq7sgu@alap3.anarazel.de> <20170712223225.zkq7tdb7pzgb3wy7@treble> <20170712223605.fplf4mvvs66rspxh@alap3.anarazel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170712223605.fplf4mvvs66rspxh@alap3.anarazel.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 670 Lines: 22 On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:36:05PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2017-07-12 17:32:25 -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > If you want perf to be able to use ORC instead of DWARF for user space > > binaries, that's not currently possible, though I don't see any > > technical blockers for doing so. Perf would need to be taught to read > > ORC data. > > Right, that's what I was hoping for. > > > > And I think it should be possible to convert DWARF to ORC, assuming the > > DWARF data is trusted. We could probably add an objtool subcommand for > > that. > > That'd be pretty helpful. Can I ask why? Is DWARF too slow, or is it something else? -- Josh