Subject: Re: Sco vs. IBM
From: Martin List-Petersen <martin@list-petersen.dk>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306181529310.31896@chaos>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306181959380.24449-100000@phoenix.infradead.org>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306181529310.31896@chaos>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OXhD7Fno9AZn2D36o00D"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1055966017.16818.21.camel@loke>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 18 Jun 2003 21:53:37 +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1278
Lines: 42


--=-OXhD7Fno9AZn2D36o00D
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 21:39, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> FYI, I noticed an unauthorized reproduction of some of my code. It
> used a variable, "i", in a "for" loop. Maybe I should go buy a lawyer.
> I can show that only persons who had been previously been poisoned
> by FORTRAN would ever use such a variable name. This certainly
> points to me.

Eerh .. one stupid question: Who has not used that and in what
programming language was it not used ?

Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot dk
--
To err is human, to forgive is against company policy.


--=-OXhD7Fno9AZn2D36o00D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+8MNAzAGaxP8W1ugRAow/AJ0Vt/ekTg+bs3HBmnQE6xblSTEyJgCgo9Ix
mCijyoisLYEJD3lOsESGpL8=
=+4/m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-OXhD7Fno9AZn2D36o00D--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/