Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751069AbdGMAlX (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:41:23 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:53608 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbdGMAlV (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:41:21 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: James Morris Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Stefan Berger , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, lkp@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tycho@docker.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, christian.brauner@mailbox.org, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com References: <1499785511-17192-1-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1499785511-17192-2-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87mv89iy7q.fsf@xmission.com> <20170712170346.GA17974@mail.hallyn.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:33:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: (James Morris's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:20:34 +1000 (AEST)") Message-ID: <87o9spfa5v.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1dVSBq-0007G4-L6;;;mid=<87o9spfa5v.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.213.87;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/Qqe/T6afjqM393JxYX1OH8kFj9ERlojg= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.213.87 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4858] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;James Morris X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 5737 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.1 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.0%), parse: 1.02 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 19 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.80 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 8 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.17 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.97 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 20 (0.4%), check_bayes: 19 (0.3%), b_tokenize: 7 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.69 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.8 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.59 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 1179 (20.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.43 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.6 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 4502 (78.5%), poll_dns_idle: 4495 (78.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 832 Lines: 24 James Morris writes: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > >> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): >> > Stefan Berger <"Stefan Bergerstefanb"@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger >> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn >> > > Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn >> > >> > It doesn't look like this is coming through Serge so I don't see how >> > the Signed-off-by tag is legtimate. >> >> This is mostly explained by the fact that there have been a *lot* of >> changes, many of them discussed in private emails. > > Please try and keep technical discussions public or at least document them > when reposting the patches. Yes please. A public discussion helps to understand what the challenges are. Eric