Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751018AbdGMEOr (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:14:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:34913 "EHLO mail-pf0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750748AbdGMEOq (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:14:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:44:43 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Joel Fernandes Cc: LKML , Patrick Bellasi , Juri Lelli , Andres Oportus , Dietmar Eggemann , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4] cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost more energy efficient Message-ID: <20170713041443.GA352@vireshk-i7> References: <20170709170826.29396-1-joelaf@google.com> <20170711101432.GB17115@vireshk-i7> <20170712050035.GH17115@vireshk-i7> <20170713033531.GI1679@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 304 Lines: 9 On 12-07-17, 20:52, Joel Fernandes wrote: > Yes, that makes sense, its a bit subtle but I get what you're doing > now and I agree with it. Its also cleaner than my original patch :-) > and yeah definitely needs a comment ;-) And I have full trust on you to include that comment in you V5 :) -- viresh