Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751067AbdGMEQe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:16:34 -0400
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:33110 "EHLO
        mail-oi0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750831AbdGMEQd (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:16:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170713041443.GA352@vireshk-i7>
References: <20170709170826.29396-1-joelaf@google.com> <20170711101432.GB17115@vireshk-i7>
 <CAJWu+oqgN+1V4AF2QowT+fT_5SMQoNMy7NgrO8Zf3eSvAByTCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170712050035.GH17115@vireshk-i7> <CAJWu+ory5-qcTcN676tm1GQ=jSuMh7FPn4QOO9hQu33w_QgAmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170713033531.GI1679@vireshk-i7> <CAJWu+or8XwnoA4SM93Cu2nhKoE8UwbdADYqPzxJ-KxOFL8uR-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170713041443.GA352@vireshk-i7>
From: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 21:16:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJWu+oorNGMwfY+Z+uiGQZssb5XMDYSeEVx6WPt-m09A5eyX9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4] cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost more energy efficient
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 408
Lines: 14

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 12-07-17, 20:52, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Yes, that makes sense, its a bit subtle but I get what you're doing
>> now and I agree with it. Its also cleaner than my original patch :-)
>> and yeah definitely needs a comment ;-)
>
> And I have full trust on you to include that comment in you V5 :)

You bet :)


thanks,

-Joel