Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265450AbTFRUQs (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:16:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265453AbTFRUQe (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:16:34 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:43934 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265450AbTFRUQZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:16:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:27:09 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.22 timeline was RE: 2.4.21-rc7 ACPI broken In-Reply-To: <20030617235838.GA2677@werewolf.able.es> Message-ID: References: <3EE66C86.8090708@free.fr> <20030617235838.GA2677@werewolf.able.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1637 Lines: 48 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, J.A. Magallon wrote: > > On 06.18, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Eric Valette wrote: > > > > > Marcelo Tosati wrote: > > > > > > >The main reason I didnt want to merge it was due to its size. Its just > > > >too big. > > > > > > >> Please stop leading me along. Will you EVER merge it? > > > > > > >Yes, I want to, and will merge it. In 2.4.23-pre. > > > > > > This kind of mails and sentence makes you lost your credibility : > > > 1) You said that ACPI will be merged in 2.4.22-pre, > > > 2) For many people ACPI (and aic7xxx) is top priority for 2.4 kernel > > > (see various post including alan). The reason being that most laptop are > > > unusable nowadays without ACPI, > > > 3) You do not explicitely says what you plan for 2.4.22... > > > > My plan for 2.4.22 is: > > > > - Include the new aic7xxx driver. > > - Include ACPI. (I now realized its importance). Already discussing with > > Andrew the best way to do it. > > - Fix the latency/interactivity problems (Chris, Nick and Andrea working > > on that) > > - Merge obviously correct -aa VM patches. > > > > Those are the most important things that are needed now, I think. > > > > Would you accept small canges like -march (gcc_check) for x86 ? I'm not aware of this patch. I might well accecpt it. Please submit it with a good explanation and I will consider it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/