Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S130380AbQKBLjy>; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 06:39:54 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S130485AbQKBLjp>; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 06:39:45 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:12090 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S130380AbQKBLj1>; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 06:39:27 -0500
Subject: Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?
To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik)
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:40:38 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: jamagallon@able.es (J . A . Magallon), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <3A00DEDC.634E46CE@mandrakesoft.com> from "Jeff Garzik" at Nov 01, 2000 10:26:20 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E13rIjX-0001S0-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Alan's message wasn't clear, but it seemed to imply that a patch to add
> this script to 2.4.x would be submitted to Linus.  gcc 2.95.2 is a bit
> smarter about some things, and I definitely prefer using that compiler. 
> I also prefer fixing 2.4.x kernel<->compiler bugs rather than defaulting
> people to an older compiler.

I haven't submitted it. Im happy to do so if people want it in.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/