Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753795AbdGNLP7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:15:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:33790 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753472AbdGNLP5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:15:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:15:36 +0200 From: Corentin Labbe To: Herbert Xu Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue skcipher request Message-ID: <20170714111536.GA30440@Red> References: <20170606134417.18850-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20170606134417.18850-3-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20170619052707.GA13180@gondor.apana.org.au> <20170619075524.GA27419@Red> <20170623064837.GA29139@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170623064837.GA29139@gondor.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1087 Lines: 19 On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:48:37PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote: > > > > Since there are two different user of "crypto engine + ablkcipher", it will be not easy to convert them in one serie. (I could do it, but I simply could not test it for OMAP (lack of hw)) > > And any new user which want to use crypto engine+skcipher (like me with the sun8i-ce driver) are simply stuck. > > You're right. We'll need to do this in a backwards-compatible way. In fact > we already do something similar in skcipher.c itself. Simply look at the > cra_type field and if it matches blkcipher/ablkcipher/givcipher then it's > legacy ablkcipher, otherwise it's skcipher. > > Also the way crypto_engine looks at the request type in the data-path is > suboptimal. This should really be built into the cra_type object. For > example, we can have cra_type->engine->prepare_request which would just > do the right thing. > Not sure to have well understand what you want. You want that I switch on cra_type instead of crypto_tfm_alg_type() ?