Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265846AbTFSRJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:09:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265848AbTFSRJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:09:40 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:23285 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265846AbTFSRJj (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:09:39 -0400 Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler seems to lock up on sched_FIFO and sched_RR ta sks From: Robert Love To: Joe Korty Cc: george anzinger , "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" , "'Andrew Morton'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'mingo@elte.hu'" , "Li, Adam" In-Reply-To: <20030619171950.GA936@rudolph.ccur.com> References: <3EF1DE35.20402@mvista.com> <20030619171950.GA936@rudolph.ccur.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1056043409.8770.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 (1.4.0-2) Date: 19 Jun 2003 10:23:30 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 674 Lines: 18 On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:19, 'joe.korty@ccur.com' wrote: > I posted a fix for this a month ago that was ignored. Which is a > good thing, since now that I look at it again, I don't care for the > approach I took nor does it appear to be complete. Ah, sorry for missing it. Other than that tertiary statement inside an if ;) my patch is about the same. Why do you think it is incomplete? It looks correct to me. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/