Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265900AbTFSTBD (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:01:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265901AbTFSTBD (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:01:03 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:30595 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265900AbTFSTBB (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:01:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 20:15:00 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: common name for the kernel DSO Message-ID: <20030619191500.GC20946@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <16112.47509.643668.116939@napali.hpl.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 544 Lines: 15 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > It's a pretty ugly name, quite frankly, since it doesn't explain what > it is a gate from or to. linux-syscall.so.1 or linux-kernel.so.1 > would make a lot more sense. linux-syscall.so.1 makes most sense to me. It's the only one which is correct and unambiguous. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/