Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751374AbdGQUmD (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:42:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:36715 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317AbdGQUmB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:42:01 -0400 From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.14.0-rc0 References: <87mv8638y5.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:41:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87mv8638y5.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFybmZqw7Zy?= =?utf-8?B?w7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Sat, 15 Jul 2017 01:17:06 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1425 Lines: 37 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > On Thu, Jul 13 2017, Junio C. Hamano jotted: > > Proposed improvements for the release notes (is this a good way to > propose RelNotes changes?) Thanks. You could also throw a patch just like any bugfix/update to documentation, I would think. > I think this may explain it better: > > * The "[includeIf "gitdir:$dir"] path=..." mechanism introduced in > 2.13.0 would canonicalize the path of the gitdir being > matched. > > Therefore it wouldn't match e.g. "gitdir:~/work/*" against a repo in > "~/work/main" if ~/work was a symlink to "/mnt/storage/work". > > Now we match both the resolved canonical path and what "pwd" would > show. The include will happen if either one matches. Will use this (and some others) verbatim ;-) Thanks. >> * Update "perl-compatible regular expression" support to enable JIT >> and also allow linking with the newer PCRE v2 library. > > At the risk of advertising work I've done too much, I think it makes > sense to split this into two separate and somewhat more verbose items: As I shoot for shorter summary, going down to too much detail in these entries is not welcome. However, an exception is the top part of the release notes where we discuss backward incompatible changes etc. that helps people to decide the deployment strategy. Encouraging migration from v1 to v2 belongs there, I would think.