Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265451AbTFSU3L (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:29:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265453AbTFSU3L (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:29:11 -0400 Received: from web14802.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.224.218]:15457 "HELO web14802.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265451AbTFSU3J (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:29:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20030619204308.39271.qmail@web14802.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:43:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Venkat Subject: Linux IDE & RAID Rebuid Issue To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: srikumarss@yahoo.com, rpraneshnews@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1987 Lines: 53 Hi all, I have two IDE controllers in my mother board (Serverworks and Silicon Image CMD 680) . I have two Maxtor IDE Drives(same model, same capacity) connected to the IDE controllers (One drive per controller). Linux detects the drives but the number of heads reported by the controller/BIOS/Linux is different. For one drive linux reports 64 heads and for the other drive it reports 255 heads. This is causing a problem with RAID rebuilding. The below text explains the problem in detail. I create a RAID drive across both the drives.I want to create a 512 MB partition on both the drives, but Redhat installatiion program creates 512MB partition on one drive and 520MB partition on the other drive. I assume that this discrepanies is due to different Head count. This is OK when the RAID drives are created, because the RAID drive takes the smallest size(512MB) But the problem happens when the one of the drives is pulled out and a new partition of same size is created and the RAID drives are rebuilt. When i create the same size partition on the new drive using FDISK, it is not exactly the size i want (512MB). It creates a 509 MB Partition on the new drive. This causes the MD RAID driver to fail the rebuild. The new drive is also of the same type and same model as the drive pulled out. So i assume that if Linux reports the same head count for the both the drives, the problem should be solved. I am not an expert on Linux IDE subtree. Can anyone explain or give a fix? If anyone needs more info please feel free to contact me. Thanks Venkatesh PS: Please CC me on replies as i am not subsribed to the list. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/