Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751489AbdGQWuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:50:17 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:44664 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751358AbdGQWuQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:50:16 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,376,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="112395982" Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:56:15 -0400 From: Keith Busch To: Sinan Kaya Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, timur@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration Message-ID: <20170717225615.GB1496@localhost.localdomain> References: <1500330983-27501-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20170717224551.GA1496@localhost.localdomain> <6d10032c-35ec-978c-6b8f-1ab9c07adf7f@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6d10032c-35ec-978c-6b8f-1ab9c07adf7f@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1204 Lines: 33 On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:46:11PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Hi Keith, > > On 7/17/2017 6:45 PM, Keith Busch wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:36:23PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > >> Code is moving the completion queue doorbell after processing all completed > >> events and sending callbacks to the block layer on each iteration. > >> > >> This is causing a performance drop when a lot of jobs are queued towards > >> the HW. Move the completion queue doorbell on each loop instead and allow new > >> jobs to be queued by the HW. > > > > That doesn't make sense. Aggregating doorbell writes should be much more > > efficient for high depth workloads. > > > > Problem is that code is throttling the HW as HW cannot queue more completions until > SW get a chance to clear it. > > As an example: > > for each in N > ( > blk_layer() > ) > ring door bell > > HW cannot queue new job until N x blk_layer operations are processed and queue > element ownership is passed to the HW after the loop. HW is just sitting idle > there if no queue entries are available. If no completion queue entries are available, then there can't possibly be any submission queue entries for the HW to work on either.