Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751572AbdGRO2N (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:28:13 -0400
Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:34402 "EHLO
        mail-oi0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751408AbdGRO2L (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:28:11 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <596E1A77.4030204@nxp.com>
References: <20170718133723.12709-1-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
 <20170718133723.12709-7-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> <CAK8P3a0zH1nVoppNkT=uVgFp-NUkmenZ0AVc9vOwHEe_VEt_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <596E1A77.4030204@nxp.com>
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:28:10 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3q2Fa14njphgPqQNOa4T6FtCZ5o
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3hxA0Vi=BSuuhROQN7gieyyLeSRoRovjH4Vb9mQCAzuw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] staging: fsl-mc: don't use raw device io functions
To: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Cc: gregkh <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>,
        "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
        Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@nxp.com>,
        Catalin Horghidan <catalin.horghidan@nxp.com>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 419
Lines: 11

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Laurentiu Tudor
<laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe i made an error in my previous emails, but the hi-lo variant is
> the correct one. The command execution is triggered when the _first_
> 32-bit half of the header (header&0xffffffff) is written, so that's why
> it must be written last.

I'm pretty sure I just misremembered it then. Thanks for the clarification.

        Arnd