Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752373AbdGRWNr (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:13:47 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:46101 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751725AbdGRWNp (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:13:45 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,378,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="880258566" From: "Luck, Tony" To: Borislav Petkov , Toshi Kani CC: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac Thread-Topic: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac Thread-Index: AQHS/4sx93QQ8jMonkW0hrLisfafFqJaJlVg Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:13:42 +0000 Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F6130C6B8@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20170717215912.26070-1-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <20170717215912.26070-4-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <20170718060007.GB8736@nazgul.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20170718060007.GB8736@nazgul.tnic> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 10.0.102.7 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.139] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by nfs id v6IMDonN005105 Content-Length: 452 Lines: 11 > The question is: does the platform do this disabling now? > > Tony, I'm looking at sb_edac and there we don't do something like that > or maybe I'm missing it. Historically we've had complaints that sb_edac won't load that have been tracked to BIOS hiding one of the (many) PCI devices that it needs. But device hiding is orthogonal to providing GHES error records. A BIOS might do that, but I don't know that anyone intentionally does so. -Tony