Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752703AbdGSCJC (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:09:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48388 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752614AbdGSCJA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:09:00 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 795C47C83A Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jpoimboe@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 795C47C83A Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:08:57 -0500 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Miroslav Benes Cc: Joe Lawrence , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu , Jiri Kosina , Petr Mladek , Chris J Arges Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: add (un)patch hooks Message-ID: <20170719020857.6gvkw4di2vjmk2ii@treble> References: <1499868600-10176-1-git-send-email-joe.lawrence@redhat.com> <1499868600-10176-2-git-send-email-joe.lawrence@redhat.com> <20170714014640.nhoowbrleu6kdka2@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1507 Lines: 33 On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:15:16PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:10:00AM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: > > > When the livepatch core executes klp_(un)patch_object, call out to a > > > livepatch-module specified array of callback hooks. These hooks provide > > > a notification mechanism for livepatch modules when klp_objects are > > > (un)patching. This may be most interesting when another kernel module > > > is a klp_object target and the livepatch module needs to execute code > > > after the target is loaded, but before its module_init code is run. > > > > And it's also useful for vmlinux. Patch module load/unload is separate > > from enable/disable, so the module init/exit functions can't be used for > > patch-specific changes (e.g., global data changes). > > I admit that I don't understand this, which is probably the reason for my > question. Why do we need it when we have module notifiers and module > init/exit functions in the kernel? Petr described different possible > scenarios and they can be solved either in init/exit function of a patch > module or in a module notifier which the patch module can register. > > If there is a difference, it should be mentioned in the documentation and > in the changelog. Some differences: - The patch module init/exit code doesn't run when disabling and re-enabling a patch. - The module notifier can't stop the to-be-patched module from loading. -- Josh