Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262316AbTFTOVh (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:21:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262321AbTFTOVh (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:21:37 -0400 Received: from windsormachine.com ([206.48.122.28]:47108 "EHLO router.windsormachine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262316AbTFTOVf (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:21:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:35:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Dresser To: Subject: Re: xircom card bus with 2.4.20 link trouble In-Reply-To: <1056119306.6727.27.camel@portable> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 970 Lines: 29 On 20 Jun 2003, Arnaud Ligot wrote: > > I haven't tried a 2.5.x kernel, nor a 2.4.21(it's on my list of things to > > do) > the card works with 2.4.20 nice and works if you set an ip address with > the 2.4.21 Going to move to 2.4.21 in a few minutes(just booting up the laptop so i can copy the vmlinuz image over to it) > I have a CEM56-100 > > I use the xirc2ps_cs module. I haven't force cardmgr to use so I think > it's the good module for the card If it's a CEM56-100, that's not a cardbus card! That's the regular pcmcia version. That would explain why your xirc2ps_cs is working. You have the same card as I do, with a differing model name. Never did figure out what's different between the REM and CEM. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/