Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 00:48:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 00:48:15 -0500 Received: from host11.optimumdata.dsl.radiks.net ([207.232.85.172]:63247 "EHLO subby.optimumdata.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 00:48:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 23:46:52 -0600 (CST) From: To: Mike Fedyk cc: Linux Advanced Routing and Trafic Control , Subject: Re: [Fwd: [LARTC] 1 adsl + 1 sdsl + masq + simultaneous incomming routes] In-Reply-To: <3AA06720.77D94BFE@matchmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > There has to be a better way. It's the one I use; it works and works well. Asking someone who deals with "network appliance" routers (ie Cisco) might lead to some ideas. But the Cisco folks I asked recommended the solution I told you about. You might have better luck asking someone else. > I'm forwarding this to LKML. Maybe they have a better idea... netdev@oss.sgi.com (or something like that) is actually a better place > I know the kernel keeps a route cache, is there something like a reverse MASQ > feature somewhere. Storing which incoming route + port number and keeping a > dynamic list... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Brutsche phil@optimumdata.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/