Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S935837AbdGTJlR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:41:17 -0400
Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:33504 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934105AbdGTJlO (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:41:14 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:41:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
        jgross@suse.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.12 26/84] x86/xen/efi: Initialize only the EFI struct
 members used by Xen
Message-ID: <20170720094110.sy552pxras33wig5@gmail.com>
References: <20170719092322.362625377@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20170719092323.396710042@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20170719103747.GZ4448@olila.local.net-space.pl>
 <20170720083910.aygobq7t7g7laszt@gmail.com>
 <20170720091639.GA1071@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170720091639.GA1071@kroah.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 986
Lines: 30


* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hey Greg,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > 
> > > Why did you skip this patch for 4.11? IMO it should be applied there too.
> > 
> > The thing is, this patch should probaly not even be in v4.12, as it should only 
> > make any difference if there's a separate _bug_ in the kernel.
> > 
> > This patch makes things more robust going forward, but I question that it needs to 
> > be in -stable.
> 
> Yeah, good point, I'm going to go drop it entirely from the 4.12-stable
> tree as it obviously isn't stable material, sorry for not catching that
> before.

I should have caught the tag as well when applying the upstream patch to begin 
with.

Thanks!

	Ingo