Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935963AbdGTLCQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:02:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:34644 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933923AbdGTLCO (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:02:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: microcode: constify attribute_group structures. To: Borislav Petkov References: <1500535305-9369-1-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> <1500535305-9369-8-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> <20170720081207.GA18424@nazgul.tnic> <27e82108-10c3-a411-d6ad-c399b603db82@gmail.com> <20170720082850.GB18424@nazgul.tnic> <3e870042-56ec-8b12-98e7-2110c7b75ac5@gmail.com> <20170720103105.GD18424@nazgul.tnic> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arvind Yadav Message-ID: <3725e8de-7b65-165a-41cc-499771a4eaae@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:31:38 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170720103105.GD18424@nazgul.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 671 Lines: 18 Hi, On Thursday 20 July 2017 04:01 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:31:09PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: >>> "Constify attribute_group structs because they don't change at runtime." >> I can add this as subject. But we should avoid lengthy subject. > Are you actually reading what I'm writing to you? I said this should be > the commit message, not the subject. > > What I'm saying is, shorten your commit message - no need for the > irrelevant before/after sizes. I'm not the first reviewer to ask WTF do > those things even mean. > Thanks :) for your suggestion. I will remove before/after size comparison. and send you back for review. ~arvind