Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:49:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:49:32 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:64759 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:49:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:49:17 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: TimO cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OOPS-kernel 2.4.3-pre1 In-Reply-To: <3AA07471.3D46194B@mcn.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, TimO wrote: > eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000 [snip] > >>EIP; c0142a52 <===== > Trace; c0142ca6 > Trace; c0145f01 > Trace; c014601a > Trace; c01349a4 > Trace; c0134f7a > Trace; c0107007 > Trace; c01074b8 > Code; c0142a52 > 00000000 <_EIP>: > Code; c0142a52 <===== [snip] Lovely. sb->s_op == NULL in iget(). The thing being, proc_read_super() explicitly sets ->s_op to non-NULL. Oh, and that area hadn't changed since 2.4.2, so I'd rather suspect the b0rken build. Can you reproduce it? Cheers, Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/