Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265145AbTFULh2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:37:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265151AbTFULh2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:37:28 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:9415 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265145AbTFULhZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:37:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [SIS IDE] Enhanced SiS96x support From: Alan Cox To: Lionel Bouton Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Vojtech Pavlik In-Reply-To: <3EF0FC4E.4090805@inet6.fr> References: <3EF0FC4E.4090805@inet6.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1056196155.25974.7.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 21 Jun 2003 12:49:16 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 745 Lines: 15 On Iau, 2003-06-19 at 00:57, Lionel Bouton wrote: > For the 2.5 tree, I'll check the latest 2.5-bk and 2.5-ac state tomorrow > (need some sleep). I see 2.5-ac is laging behind (.69 vs .72), do you > want me to push a patch to Linus directly or to you first ? If you want > it first, against 2.5-bk or -ac (or both) ? 2.5-ac is defunct for the moment due to the amount of 2.4 stuff I need to get done and fixed up. For 2.5 IDE send it to Bartlomiej who is now 2.5 IDE maintainer and doing wonders - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/