Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265178AbTFUMlL (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 08:41:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265181AbTFUMlL (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 08:41:11 -0400 Received: from mail.hometree.net ([212.34.181.120]:13999 "EHLO mail.hometree.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265178AbTFUMlK (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 08:41:10 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" Newsgroups: hometree.linux.kernel Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM] Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Organization: INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH Message-ID: References: <063301c32c47$ddc792d0$3f00a8c0@witbe> <20030621143416.31978fc2.skraw@ithnet.com> Reply-To: hps@intermeta.de NNTP-Posting-Host: forge.intermeta.de X-Trace: tangens.hometree.net 1056200112 17289 212.34.181.4 (21 Jun 2003 12:55:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@intermeta.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:55:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Copyright: (C) 1996-2003 Henning Schmiedehausen X-No-Archive: yes User-Agent: nn/6.6.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2282 Lines: 48 Stephan von Krawczynski writes: >Well Henning, question is: did you jump from W95/98 to XP? You should have >followed the product flow according to the vendor: >W95->W98->NT3->NT4->W2K->XP That's BS. There is no "W98 -> NT3" jump. Fact is, that programs written in 1995 for Win95 still run on XP. Without changes from my side (I consider myself a sore (l)user on Windows who can hustle a mouse and squish little images so that a text processor or a business package appears. Never had any interest to do more with it). I don't give a fscking hoot through how many loops the vendor had to jump to make this possible. You simply can't do this with the current linux distributions. I just pulled out my trustworthy old RedHat 4.2 (which was sometime released in Summer 1997; the Wayback Machine gave me only Mar1997 for 4.1 and Dec1997 for 5.0) and guess how many of its binaries still run on my RedHat-9 desktop here? >Have you tried your apps on NT3/NT4? If they didn't work back _then_ you >probably have exchanged them back then - which was the original intention of >the whole story. I tried NT4. Yes, the program in question (which is a quite complex accounting and business program I'm using for ages) runs. So does e.g. CorelDraw. Backward compatibility is the mantra of successful software. Without it, you simply won't accumulate an user base. You may want to read the article by Pat Gelsinger (sp?) in the last c't magazine. He did talk about processors, but software is the same thing. Look where the two companies that did put this above everything else are (HW: Intel SW: Microsoft)? Regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH hps@intermeta.de +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire --- Quote of the week: "Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." --- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/