Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261300AbTFUNYg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 09:24:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262525AbTFUNYg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 09:24:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.12]:39561 "EHLO smtp.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261300AbTFUNYe (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 09:24:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 06:38:31 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: Larry McVoy , jgarzik@pobox.com, lawrence@the-penguin.otak.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM] Message-ID: <20030621133831.GA10089@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Stephan von Krawczynski , Larry McVoy , jgarzik@pobox.com, lawrence@the-penguin.otak.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030619165916.GA14404@work.bitmover.com> <20030620001217.G6248@almesberger.net> <20030620120910.3f2cb001.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030620142436.GB14404@work.bitmover.com> <20030620143012.GC14404@work.bitmover.com> <20030620163349.GG17563@work.bitmover.com> <20030621142048.2ae63afa.skraw@ithnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030621142048.2ae63afa.skraw@ithnet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.5, required 7, AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1870 Lines: 39 On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 02:20:48PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:33:49 -0700 > Larry McVoy wrote: > > > All of this is problematic for open source based business models because > > if the product is truly open source then the vendor is standing on much > > shakier ground. What guarentee does the buyer have that the vendor will > > make it to next year and support the product? No matter how you slice it, > > it's a much higher risk equation for the buyer than a commercial choice. > > Larry, sorry, but this is pure bs. > > If a company survives has absolutely _zero_ to do with commercial or > non-commmercial give-away of products. First of all, tell that ti the IT managers, they are the ones you need to convince. I believe that I have faithfully and accurately relayed what I've learned from them. Second, the point you are missing, on purpose? is that with a pure open source play there is no barrier to entry for anyone else, they can take your source and sell it under the same terms. There is a reason that the VC's want to know what you have that noone else has and how you are going to keep them from getting it. Hate VC's all you want, they still have a point. You're welcome to rant and rave about how wrong all this is, but they are well established basic business principles and your ranting isn't going to change them, it's going to take something more substantial to do that. If you want to change them, start with talking to the business folks, not me. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/