Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751623AbdGUEHt (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:07:49 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0174.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.174]:33327 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751065AbdGUEHs (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:07:48 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1381:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1561:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3867:3871:3872:4321:5007:7903:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12048:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14659:21080:21627:30036:30054:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: floor81_996a353a5537 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1513 Message-ID: <1500610064.14415.20.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/25] lib, rtc: Print rtc_time via %pt[dt][rv] From: Joe Perches To: Mark Salyzyn , Andy Shevchenko , Rasmus Villemoes , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:07:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <0b7ab8a2-9ec9-8d0b-3e45-20610f3ab598@android.com> References: <20170608134811.60786-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1500400205.25934.27.camel@perches.com> <861fe353-eb95-615f-b1dc-3326501342af@android.com> <1500546822.29303.136.camel@linux.intel.com> <0b7ab8a2-9ec9-8d0b-3e45-20610f3ab598@android.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 244 Lines: 5 On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 10:57 -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote: > It would probably need to take struct timespec64 as an argument. Pass by > structure might be difficult to swallow, so pass by pointer? Every %p extension is passed via a pointer.