Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:39:56 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
        Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5] cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost more energy
 efficient
Message-ID: <20170721040956.GL352@vireshk-i7>
References: <20170716080407.28492-1-joelaf@google.com>
 <20170717080441.GM352@vireshk-i7>
 <CAJWu+oqU+qVMM4M0k4d7YeUFV-Aq4vZUU3JyWrMy6GQHA1MLQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170718054558.GU352@vireshk-i7>
 <CAJWu+op=S3KBr+gQo=wdRfwYSPt5FDwhQu6tBbGHCX=DUh830w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170719061937.GB352@vireshk-i7>
 <CAJWu+ooAJOCofKdqKTKe=eO7TPURtSjcDQvUUZdzs+N5h38mgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170720034148.GI352@vireshk-i7>
 <CAJWu+oqCnvi0ZvsbWOxJ2aSr+Vw6iXS+evxPLbUB1+CMf6v9+A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJWu+oqCnvi0ZvsbWOxJ2aSr+Vw6iXS+evxPLbUB1+CMf6v9+A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 278
Lines: 10

On 20-07-17, 12:49, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Yes I think that's fine, I thought about it some more and I think this
> can be an issue in a scenario where
> 
> iowait_boost_max < policy->min  but:

We will never have this case as boost-max is set to cpuinfo.max_freq.

-- 
viresh