Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752059AbdGVG3F (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:29:05 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:58954 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750891AbdGVG3D (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:29:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 08:28:53 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Kani, Toshimitsu" Cc: "mchehab@s-opensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac Message-ID: <20170722062853.GA2050@nazgul.tnic> References: <20170721104001.3cd2b884@vento.lan> <20170721134715.GC5036@nazgul.tnic> <1500649162.2042.43.camel@hpe.com> <20170721151317.GA13424@nazgul.tnic> <1500650732.2042.45.camel@hpe.com> <20170721124401.5f94aba9@vento.lan> <1500654661.2042.49.camel@hpe.com> <20170721140131.40079805@vento.lan> <20170721172344.GA11316@nazgul.tnic> <1500661773.2042.53.camel@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1500661773.2042.53.camel@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 392 Lines: 13 On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 06:38:52PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > Enterprise platforms have very different model (I do not say it's > better for everyone from the cost perspective). Typically, such But you do tell your customers that the error counts they see are not really what *actually* happens, right? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --