Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752051AbdGVGgI (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:36:08 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:59122 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830AbdGVGgG (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:36:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 08:36:02 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Julia Lawall Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: remove unnecessary static in edac_fake_inject_write() Message-ID: <20170722063602.GB2050@nazgul.tnic> References: <20170704214440.GA9462@embeddedgus> <20170717083946.GB23129@nazgul.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 479 Lines: 21 On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > Someone pointed out that the rule is probably not OK when the address of > the static variable is taken, because then it is likely being used as > permanent storage. Makes sense to me. > An improved rule is: Do you think it is worth having it in scripts/coccinelle/ ? I don't think Gustavo would mind putting it there :) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --