Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264828AbTFUXyd (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:54:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264862AbTFUXyc (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:54:32 -0400 Received: from orion.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.90]:32775 "EHLO orion.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264828AbTFUXy1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:54:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:11:01 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning Message-ID: <20030622001101.GB10801@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030621125111.0bb3dc1c.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Organization: Conectiva S.A. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 852 Lines: 24 Em Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:53:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu: > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Meanwhile, let's do this: > > I'd prefer the C99 thing, ie > > for (int i = xxx ...) > > syntax. I know gcc-3.x supports it, maybe 2.96 does too? If so, we could > just add "-std=c99" or whatever, and start using that. Humm, I'd love to do that, i.e. to make gcc 3 required, lots of good stuff like this one, anonymous structs, etc, etc, lots of stuff could be done in an easier way, but are we ready to abandon gcc 2.95.*? Can anyone confirm if gcc 2.96 accepts this? - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/