Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265443AbTFVCI1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:08:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265445AbTFVCI1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:08:27 -0400 Received: from uslink-66.173.43-133.uslink.net ([66.173.43.133]:56328 "EHLO dingdong.cryptoapps.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265443AbTFVCI1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:08:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:27:59 -0500 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Andrew Morton Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , torvalds@transmeta.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning Message-ID: <20030622022759.GA30107@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> References: <20030621125111.0bb3dc1c.akpm@digeo.com> <20030622001101.GB10801@conectiva.com.br> <20030622014102.GB29661@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> <20030622014345.GD10801@conectiva.com.br> <20030621191705.3c1dbb16.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030621191705.3c1dbb16.akpm@digeo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 631 Lines: 19 On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:17:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Compared to 2.95.3, gcc-3.3 takes 1.5x as long to compile, and > produces a kernel which is 200k larger. Do we know why this is the case? I assume the fix is far from trivial? > It is simply worthless. I stopped using 2.95.x recently because of miscompiles. Even vendor compilers seemed to break at times :( --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/